Dutch Hunger Winter
From the start of November 1944 to the late spring of 1945 reveals
the suffer of the tragedy known as the ‘Dutch hunger winter.’ Remarkably
depicted as a bitterly cold period in Western Europe causing a hardship on a
continent that had been ruined from four-years of brutal war. Being under
German control resulted in a catastrophic drop in the availability of food to
the Dutch population. In worse cases, the populations were given a situation to
survive by only 30 percent of the normal daily calorie intake. For example,
people ate grass, tulip bulbs, and burned every scrap of furniture they could
get their hands on, to stay alive. By the time the food supplies were restored
in May 1945, more than 20,000 people had died.
The first participant was the effect of the famine
on the birth weights of children who had been in the womb during the
devastation. If a mother was well fed around the time of conception and
malnourished only for the last few months of the pregnancy, her baby was
likely to be born small. However, if the mother suffered malnutrition
only for the first three months, but then was well fed, she was likely
to have a normal size baby.
As a result of this aspect, with continuous research of these groups
of babies for decades, became essential. The babies who were born small
stayed small all their lives, with lower obesity rates than the general
population. Even though they had access to food as much as they wanted
later on, their bodies never got over the early period of malnutrition.
On the other hand, children whose mothers had been malnourished only
early in pregnancy had higher obesity rates than normal. Even though
those individuals had seemed perfectly healthy at birth, something had
happened to their development in the womb that affected them for
decades after. And it wasn’t just the fact that something had happened
that mattered, it was when it happened. Events that take place in the
first three months of gestation, a stage when the fetus is really very
small and developing very rapidly, can affect an individual for the rest
of his or her life. Even more extraordinarily, some of these effects seem to be present
in the children of this group, that is, in the grandchildren of the
women who were malnourished during the first three months of their
pregnancy. Therefore, something that happened in one pregnant population
affected their children’s children. That raised the really puzzling
question of how those effects were passed on to subsequent generations.
The second participants were schizophrenia patient.
This is a dreadful mental illness, which, if untreated, can completely
overwhelm and disable an affected person. Patients may present with a
range of symptoms including delusions, hallucinations, and enormous
difficulties focusing mentally. People with schizophrenia may become
completely incapable of distinguishing between the “real world” and
their own hallucinatory and delusional realm. Normal cognitive,
emotional, and societal responses are lost. There is a terrible
misconception, however, that people with schizophrenia are likely to be
violent and dangerous. For the great majority of patients that isn’t the
case at all, and the people most likely to suffer harm because of this
illness are the patients themselves. Individuals with schizophrenia are
fifty times as likely to attempt suicide as healthy individuals.
Schizophrenia is tragically common. It affects between 0.5 and 1 percent
of the population in most countries and cultures, which means that
there may be more than 50 million people alive today who are suffering
from this condition. Scientists have known for some time that genetics
plays a strong role in determining if a person will develop this
illness. We know this because if one of a pair of identical twins has
schizophrenia, there is a 50 percent chance that their twin will also
have the condition. That is much higher than the 1 percent risk in the
general population or even the 15 percent risk for fraternal twins.
Identical twins have exactly the same genetic code as each other. They
share the same womb, and usually they are brought up in very similar
environments. When we consider this, it doesn’t seem surprising that if
one of the twins develops schizophrenia, the chance that his or her twin
will also develop the illness is very high. In fact, we have to start
wondering why it isn’t higher. Flip a coin—heads they win,
tails they lose. Variations in the environment are unlikely to account
for this, and even if they did, how would those environmental effects
have such profoundly different impacts on two genetically identical
people?
As a result, sometimes everything works out well for such children. They grow up into happy, stable individuals indistinguishable from all their peers who had normal, non-abusive childhoods. But often, tragically, it doesn’t work out this way. Children who have suffered from abuse or neglect in their early years grow up with a substantially higher risk of adult mental health problems than the general population. All too often such a child grows up into an adult at high risk of depression, self-harm, drug abuse, and suicide. In some cases, the adult may have absolutely no recollection of the traumatic events, and yet he or she may suffer the consequences mentally and emotionally for the rest of life.
In conclusion, these three case studies seem very different on the surface. The first is mainly about nutrition, especially of the unborn child. The second is about the differences that arise between genetically identical individuals. The third is about long-term psychological damage as a result of childhood abuse.But these stories are linked at a very fundamental biological level. They are all examples of epigenetics. Epigenetics is the new discipline that is revolutionizing biology. Whenever two genetically identical individuals are nonidentical in some way we can measure, this is called epigenetics. When a change in environment has biological consequences that last long after the event itself has vanished into distant memory, we are seeing an epigenetic effect in action.
No comments:
Post a Comment